New in the Bag: Cleveland CG15 Wedge
Well as luck would have it, Cleveland Golf released the CG15 wedge line just as it was time to replace my current pitching wedge which came with my CG4 irons.
I've looked at a few others, and come back to the Clevelands. They feel good and perform well. I have five of them in total (46, 52,56, 60 and 64 degree), although I don't play them all. They range from 588s in chrome & gunmetal to the newer CG12s in black pearl and now as of this weekend, the CG15 in black pearl.

Cleveland offers these beauties in a few different finishes. I'm generally not a fan of the chrome, although I do have one in that finish (the 60 degree 588). Overall, wear & tear tends to show up a bit less on chrome than the black pearl, but still...I like the black pearl. Also available is the Oil Quenched, which basically looks like the 'ol beryllium copper Ping used to offer many years ago. I always liked that look.
This time I needed a 46 degree to replace my PW, and I wanted to stick with the same loft I had previously. Selection at that end of the loft spectrum tends to be a bit light in stores, so I went with the black pearl I like. Had they the Oil Quenched I might have considered it.
The looks of these wedges have been met with some cheers & jeers since images were available. The face is laser etched to provide more bite & spin on the ball. Which it does, amazingly well. However, the etchings are also painted and have some text "laser milled" on either side of the face. Honestly, you don't see it. And seriously if you can, well first, good for you, second...you're looking at the wrong thing.

Feel of the club, at least to me is exactly what I'd expect from Cleveland. Love it. The weighting is similar to that of the CG12s, so it's really not much of a difference there, but it's definitely a bit different than the stock CG4 irons. It has a much larger face overall, which I like and I think makes it a more versatile club.
On the performance scale, well I haven't had the chance to work with it 'in anger' so to speak but I did work it over at the range this weekend. Let's just say that I could see the ball spinning back in long grass. That has to be good for something, no? The one thing I will say though, the CG15s - and ZipGrooves in general - have a habit of really biting into the ball. So much so that you end up with residue of the cover left on the clubface.
Overall though, I like them and the CG15 is a keeper in my bag.
I've looked at a few others, and come back to the Clevelands. They feel good and perform well. I have five of them in total (46, 52,56, 60 and 64 degree), although I don't play them all. They range from 588s in chrome & gunmetal to the newer CG12s in black pearl and now as of this weekend, the CG15 in black pearl.

Cleveland offers these beauties in a few different finishes. I'm generally not a fan of the chrome, although I do have one in that finish (the 60 degree 588). Overall, wear & tear tends to show up a bit less on chrome than the black pearl, but still...I like the black pearl. Also available is the Oil Quenched, which basically looks like the 'ol beryllium copper Ping used to offer many years ago. I always liked that look.
This time I needed a 46 degree to replace my PW, and I wanted to stick with the same loft I had previously. Selection at that end of the loft spectrum tends to be a bit light in stores, so I went with the black pearl I like. Had they the Oil Quenched I might have considered it.
The looks of these wedges have been met with some cheers & jeers since images were available. The face is laser etched to provide more bite & spin on the ball. Which it does, amazingly well. However, the etchings are also painted and have some text "laser milled" on either side of the face. Honestly, you don't see it. And seriously if you can, well first, good for you, second...you're looking at the wrong thing.

Feel of the club, at least to me is exactly what I'd expect from Cleveland. Love it. The weighting is similar to that of the CG12s, so it's really not much of a difference there, but it's definitely a bit different than the stock CG4 irons. It has a much larger face overall, which I like and I think makes it a more versatile club.
On the performance scale, well I haven't had the chance to work with it 'in anger' so to speak but I did work it over at the range this weekend. Let's just say that I could see the ball spinning back in long grass. That has to be good for something, no? The one thing I will say though, the CG15s - and ZipGrooves in general - have a habit of really biting into the ball. So much so that you end up with residue of the cover left on the clubface.
Overall though, I like them and the CG15 is a keeper in my bag.
Story of the swing: More changes, more difficulty
Four sessions down with the PGA Pro, trying to undo 30 years of bad swing habits have left me with some clarity and some confusion.
While I think I am making progress in flattening out the swing plane, I am finally at a point where the changes are getting more difficult to implement. With the moves I am making now, the backswing is shorter, at least in feel and overall shot yardage is shorter but more controlled. Once we start making more changes through impact I'll likely get back some of the distance I was used to previously.
By way of comparison, my 8-iron used to be about 160 yards. At the moment it is roughly 145-150, so I've essentially dropped a club of distance but gained a bit more control in the swing. A reasonable trade-off in the end, since at the end of the day, accuracy is more important than inflated distance.
Practice yesterday was a mixed and somewhat frustrating affair, however, attempting to implement everything we've been working on was always bound to be difficult. At this point I am selecting just a couple of things to work on & think about in order to minimize my swing thoughts.
We'll see. I need to see another decent practice or go play a round and see how it goes to be happy that progress is being made. I'll likely video myself as well here at the house to see what is going on.
While I think I am making progress in flattening out the swing plane, I am finally at a point where the changes are getting more difficult to implement. With the moves I am making now, the backswing is shorter, at least in feel and overall shot yardage is shorter but more controlled. Once we start making more changes through impact I'll likely get back some of the distance I was used to previously.
By way of comparison, my 8-iron used to be about 160 yards. At the moment it is roughly 145-150, so I've essentially dropped a club of distance but gained a bit more control in the swing. A reasonable trade-off in the end, since at the end of the day, accuracy is more important than inflated distance.
Practice yesterday was a mixed and somewhat frustrating affair, however, attempting to implement everything we've been working on was always bound to be difficult. At this point I am selecting just a couple of things to work on & think about in order to minimize my swing thoughts.
We'll see. I need to see another decent practice or go play a round and see how it goes to be happy that progress is being made. I'll likely video myself as well here at the house to see what is going on.
Results from today's charity golf outing
First off, Weston Hills Country Club is nestled amoung some very nice homes. The course itself is actually rather hilly for a Florida course, somewhat like what I've played in South Carolina with waste areas and the like dotting the fairways. As many courses down here do, there's a reasonable amount of water to add to the challenge.
It's in rather good shape, but we certainly found the greens to be very slow. Nearly every putt has some break to it, so reading the proper line is even more critical.
This was the 4-ball scramble format, popular for such events. If you're not familiar, each player tees off and then the best ball is selected for the position of where the next shot is played from. Continue until you hole out, then repeat. I like these formats, because for one they're generally low stress. The idea is to have fun. I also like it, because when you can get one shot "safe" it allows the other players to have some chance at "going for it" and trying something different.
As for my personal game, I definately had more drives I was happy with today than Saturday. That part of the new swing changes worked well for me in this round. The interesting thing today though, was that I wasn't as happy with some of my iron play. On Par 3's I did reasonably well, but many of my other approach shots I wasn't happy with. Not sure what the deal is, but I'll work on it and move on.
One thing that certainly came into focus today was the fact that for whatever reason, I tend to line up right of the target when I entirely believe I am lined up square. I don't know what to make of that other than I know I can't see it myself. *sigh* A high priority item to work on.
Overall we ended up with a 66, 6 under par. Not the worst, but not a winner either.
A good day today, nice weather but for a touch of rain. All for a good cause, so everyone's a winner.
It's in rather good shape, but we certainly found the greens to be very slow. Nearly every putt has some break to it, so reading the proper line is even more critical.
This was the 4-ball scramble format, popular for such events. If you're not familiar, each player tees off and then the best ball is selected for the position of where the next shot is played from. Continue until you hole out, then repeat. I like these formats, because for one they're generally low stress. The idea is to have fun. I also like it, because when you can get one shot "safe" it allows the other players to have some chance at "going for it" and trying something different.
As for my personal game, I definately had more drives I was happy with today than Saturday. That part of the new swing changes worked well for me in this round. The interesting thing today though, was that I wasn't as happy with some of my iron play. On Par 3's I did reasonably well, but many of my other approach shots I wasn't happy with. Not sure what the deal is, but I'll work on it and move on.
One thing that certainly came into focus today was the fact that for whatever reason, I tend to line up right of the target when I entirely believe I am lined up square. I don't know what to make of that other than I know I can't see it myself. *sigh* A high priority item to work on.
Overall we ended up with a 66, 6 under par. Not the worst, but not a winner either.
A good day today, nice weather but for a touch of rain. All for a good cause, so everyone's a winner.
Tweaked swing, mixed results early on...
So after my first Pro meeting on Thursday, I was set to play Saturday morning. I decided before we teed off that I wasn't going to keep score. It would have been pointless considering what I was working on. For the front nine at least, that proved to be a very good decision.
Needless to say I had what I'd describe as a horrid front nine. Comfort level was next to nil, and frankly I was thinking about too much stuff. I was pretty happy to get the front over with.
Starting on the back I think I finally was getting comfortable with the changes, or starting to at least. I had a string of 4 pars on the back nine, and a couple of those were looks at birdie (even if a bit far). All in all my iron play at least was more consistent. A very good thing.
I probably had one or two drives I was happy with, one in particular that I was really happy with leaving me about 105 to the pin on a 371 yard par 4, for 266 yards on the drive. Other than that, they weren't terribly good but I can't say that given what we're doing, I should have expected much else.
Since I'll be heading to COMMON on Thursday this week, and won't be back until the 1st, it'll be a couple weeks until the next session. But, I do play again tomorrow in a charity scramble so we'll see how that goes.
I tend to really like the "better ball" type of events because the pressure's kinda off. They're a more enjoyable day since if you have one ball that's in good shape the other players can go for it a bit more easily.
So that's it for now, summary after tomorrow's round.
Needless to say I had what I'd describe as a horrid front nine. Comfort level was next to nil, and frankly I was thinking about too much stuff. I was pretty happy to get the front over with.
Starting on the back I think I finally was getting comfortable with the changes, or starting to at least. I had a string of 4 pars on the back nine, and a couple of those were looks at birdie (even if a bit far). All in all my iron play at least was more consistent. A very good thing.
I probably had one or two drives I was happy with, one in particular that I was really happy with leaving me about 105 to the pin on a 371 yard par 4, for 266 yards on the drive. Other than that, they weren't terribly good but I can't say that given what we're doing, I should have expected much else.
Since I'll be heading to COMMON on Thursday this week, and won't be back until the 1st, it'll be a couple weeks until the next session. But, I do play again tomorrow in a charity scramble so we'll see how that goes.
I tend to really like the "better ball" type of events because the pressure's kinda off. They're a more enjoyable day since if you have one ball that's in good shape the other players can go for it a bit more easily.
So that's it for now, summary after tomorrow's round.
How to fix my golf game: Episode 1
I met with my teaching pro Tom today for our first session. I've decided to stop trying to correct things on my own and have a professional tell my where I suck instead. They're quite good at that.
So the problems are:
1. I tried to fix this on my own and managed to screw it up....not so worse than it was, just in new and different ways. Brilliant.
2. Too much lower body action, in particular my left knee & foot decided to go all crazy on me and move about. What the heck is that....ahh but see #3 for why.
3. My thought from the blog entry a couple days ago where I talked about that full shoulder turn....yea that was stupid (see #1). I was already there, but couldn't tell since of course I can't really see what I am doing. The result was in order to really pull that off, yep, you guessed it. The left knee moved because the left foot was off the ground a TON more than it ever should be. A little bit is ok, many pros have done that over the years, but yeowsers.
4. Cascading down here, the next issue was my takeaway itself, somehow I'd decided a new & fun way to do that which amazingly I am able to get the thing relatively back on plane coming down...but it's way too much inside on the takeaway. So we're fixing that. In fact I think I was doing it better some time ago when I decided to change it for some dumb reason. Go figure.
So there are a few other minor things to work on, but overall I know my fundamentals don't totally stink (no Charles Barkley here), it's all the tweaky stuff that we do to try and "fix" something which really hoses things up. Thus the professional consultation. : )
So we'll see how it goes. I am, right now, happy with what we've talked about. It makes sense and I have some path to work on.
I plan on entering more information here as the sessions happen. Oh and did I mention I am scheduled to play on Saturday and Monday? LOL yea that could be interesting. Just have to keep the swing thoughts to a minimum.
So the problems are:
1. I tried to fix this on my own and managed to screw it up....not so worse than it was, just in new and different ways. Brilliant.
2. Too much lower body action, in particular my left knee & foot decided to go all crazy on me and move about. What the heck is that....ahh but see #3 for why.
3. My thought from the blog entry a couple days ago where I talked about that full shoulder turn....yea that was stupid (see #1). I was already there, but couldn't tell since of course I can't really see what I am doing. The result was in order to really pull that off, yep, you guessed it. The left knee moved because the left foot was off the ground a TON more than it ever should be. A little bit is ok, many pros have done that over the years, but yeowsers.
4. Cascading down here, the next issue was my takeaway itself, somehow I'd decided a new & fun way to do that which amazingly I am able to get the thing relatively back on plane coming down...but it's way too much inside on the takeaway. So we're fixing that. In fact I think I was doing it better some time ago when I decided to change it for some dumb reason. Go figure.
So there are a few other minor things to work on, but overall I know my fundamentals don't totally stink (no Charles Barkley here), it's all the tweaky stuff that we do to try and "fix" something which really hoses things up. Thus the professional consultation. : )
So we'll see how it goes. I am, right now, happy with what we've talked about. It makes sense and I have some path to work on.
I plan on entering more information here as the sessions happen. Oh and did I mention I am scheduled to play on Saturday and Monday? LOL yea that could be interesting. Just have to keep the swing thoughts to a minimum.
Getting back into the "swing" of things.
Ok, first off this is a terrible title I know. : )
So it shouldn't be a secret that I am dedicating myself to improving my golf game once & for all. Of course it's a never ending process, but I am looking to make some significant strides this year. Florida weather certainly helps with that.
I figured I would post some updates along the way, talk about what I am working on and the like.
On my Golf Page I have the current equipment list, and it hasn't changed since I posted it. I have however, taken up changing my grips since the original Cleveland-branded Golf Pride Tour Velvets were ready to go.
At this point I have installed Golf Pride New Decade Midsize (red) grips on nearly everything. My 60 degree wedge has a standard New Decade red. So far I love these grips, although I might very well change out a couple of them, opting to play with a standard grip over a couple wraps of build-up tape.
If you've never been sized for grips, I'd highly recommend it. The grip is very often overlooked. Smaller hands need smaller grips, larger hands...you get the idea. But this isn't all of it. A too large grip can cause a slice. Too small, a hook. For those who have arthritis, they might need a larger grip for comfort, even up to a Jumbo. It is also not uncommon to have different grips on different clubs. You might want a bit more action on the short irons and opt for standards there, midsize everywhere else or some other combination.
I tried several grips when I looked at replacing mine, included the much talked about Winn Grips. Personally - of the ones I tried, I like the Golf Pride. However, I did swing a driver outfitted with a Jumbo Winn DSI the other day and it felt really good.
Anyway, Golf Pride generally says look to your glove size for grip size. A good metric, although not necessarily precise. Generally your gloved hand fingers should just brush the palm of your hand when you grip the club. For me, standard grips had my fingers jammed into my palm. Thus the change. We'll see how it goes.
So what else am I working on? Well besides the simple matter of consistency in "routine," the one swing thought for my driver is "make a full turn." I discovered that I was rushing to get to the downswing and not making a full shoulder turn. The result was a slice, because I was late in the release. My body got through the ball way before the club could square for impact. Making this fuller, more CONTROLLED turn (i.e. even somewhat slower) has helped correct this problem, without really sacrificing distance.
In fact when you've noticed over Masters weekend, when Phil Mickelson was sending his drives off-line, he was rehearsing exactly that - the shift & timing of getting the body/shoulders/arms around at the same time to get the club square. In two seconds or less, the golf swing is a precision movement.
I am planning on getting back together with a pro in the near future to work on some of this & hopefully pull up some consistency in the swing. I'd expect it to make a big difference.
Of course I continue to spend some time on the short game, as everyone should - but right now getting the full swing under control is my main goal.
Fun stuff. More later.
So it shouldn't be a secret that I am dedicating myself to improving my golf game once & for all. Of course it's a never ending process, but I am looking to make some significant strides this year. Florida weather certainly helps with that.
I figured I would post some updates along the way, talk about what I am working on and the like.
On my Golf Page I have the current equipment list, and it hasn't changed since I posted it. I have however, taken up changing my grips since the original Cleveland-branded Golf Pride Tour Velvets were ready to go.
At this point I have installed Golf Pride New Decade Midsize (red) grips on nearly everything. My 60 degree wedge has a standard New Decade red. So far I love these grips, although I might very well change out a couple of them, opting to play with a standard grip over a couple wraps of build-up tape.
If you've never been sized for grips, I'd highly recommend it. The grip is very often overlooked. Smaller hands need smaller grips, larger hands...you get the idea. But this isn't all of it. A too large grip can cause a slice. Too small, a hook. For those who have arthritis, they might need a larger grip for comfort, even up to a Jumbo. It is also not uncommon to have different grips on different clubs. You might want a bit more action on the short irons and opt for standards there, midsize everywhere else or some other combination.
I tried several grips when I looked at replacing mine, included the much talked about Winn Grips. Personally - of the ones I tried, I like the Golf Pride. However, I did swing a driver outfitted with a Jumbo Winn DSI the other day and it felt really good.
Anyway, Golf Pride generally says look to your glove size for grip size. A good metric, although not necessarily precise. Generally your gloved hand fingers should just brush the palm of your hand when you grip the club. For me, standard grips had my fingers jammed into my palm. Thus the change. We'll see how it goes.
So what else am I working on? Well besides the simple matter of consistency in "routine," the one swing thought for my driver is "make a full turn." I discovered that I was rushing to get to the downswing and not making a full shoulder turn. The result was a slice, because I was late in the release. My body got through the ball way before the club could square for impact. Making this fuller, more CONTROLLED turn (i.e. even somewhat slower) has helped correct this problem, without really sacrificing distance.
In fact when you've noticed over Masters weekend, when Phil Mickelson was sending his drives off-line, he was rehearsing exactly that - the shift & timing of getting the body/shoulders/arms around at the same time to get the club square. In two seconds or less, the golf swing is a precision movement.
I am planning on getting back together with a pro in the near future to work on some of this & hopefully pull up some consistency in the swing. I'd expect it to make a big difference.
Of course I continue to spend some time on the short game, as everyone should - but right now getting the full swing under control is my main goal.
Fun stuff. More later.
Dear Golf Channel...fix your discussion boards!
There is simply no excuse for this. Golf Channel seriously needs a real IT department and a real commitment to providing a quality online experience for its visitors.
Cable network or not, there's got to be some funding coming into that network that they could pay for putting up a decent discussion board system for the golfing fans out there.
Otherwise heck I should start one myself.
On the surface the Golf Channel website isn't terrible. It does run with Microsoft's ASPX framework, so you can plan on some things not working well with browsers other than IE. It gets a bit clunky from time to time but overall it is OK. I don't care for the news article comments which seem to always be formatted as one lump of text, ugly and not easy to read.
However, when you try to make use of the discussion boards you see the dirty underbelly of the site. It's just pathetic, and here's why:
First off, there's the frameset basis for the whole thing. Sure back in the day this might be a way to accomplish this task, but not today. The whole presentation is terrible. Even the top logo is cut off. Funny stuff.
Second is the left hand nav bar which lists the threads in a topic, but it scrolls independently from the rest of the content and generally wraps text around itself and doesn't appear to resize well. Sure you can change the "size" of the frame but the content doesn't adjust with it. Pointless.
Thirdly, there is the mysterious login name issue. It seems that from time to time it "remembers" you using some other name to log onto the site? Isn't that lovely...come on folks. Even Microsoft can do security better than that. They say it's some kind of cookie issue but that's funny when the cookie should contain MY logon name not someone else's.
Now, even with the ugliness factor of the site, I went out there to participate. Well that would be nice if I could actually post something. However, when every time you click a topic to reply the connection fails and gives you an error it becomes a tad difficult to participate.
The thing is that there are so many good options out there to fix this that it's quite insane they haven't done something about it. Reading what I can of the forum I am not alone in my critique here. With things like vBulletin, phpBB, Joomla CMS, Drupal CMS all readily available and open source, there is just no excuse.
Heck go follow the lead of the PGA Tour and use Lotus Domino and other Lotus technologies. And while you're at it, ditch Microsoft ASP and Windows server. The moderator says he has "hackers" getting in the site and he has no idea where they're coming from. Hmm, competent IT? Hardly. Give me one IBM POWER system with the IBM i operating system and I'll run the whole thing (including PHP based apps) and be good to go.
Clearly GC isn't capable of handling this on their own. In fact there was a comment from a moderator indicating they were "looking at" outsourcing the web environment. Please do so...NOW! What's funnier still is that the moderator asked if anyone had input to send it along. Well the email forms don't seem to work (go figure), and when I try to add a comment I can't, so hey good stuff.
This is of course the Internet and there are other golf forums out there to participate in. Frankly I suggest everyone who's a golf fan go check them out, because Golf Channel's discussion boards aren't worth the effort.
Cable network or not, there's got to be some funding coming into that network that they could pay for putting up a decent discussion board system for the golfing fans out there.
Otherwise heck I should start one myself.
On the surface the Golf Channel website isn't terrible. It does run with Microsoft's ASPX framework, so you can plan on some things not working well with browsers other than IE. It gets a bit clunky from time to time but overall it is OK. I don't care for the news article comments which seem to always be formatted as one lump of text, ugly and not easy to read.
However, when you try to make use of the discussion boards you see the dirty underbelly of the site. It's just pathetic, and here's why:
First off, there's the frameset basis for the whole thing. Sure back in the day this might be a way to accomplish this task, but not today. The whole presentation is terrible. Even the top logo is cut off. Funny stuff.
Second is the left hand nav bar which lists the threads in a topic, but it scrolls independently from the rest of the content and generally wraps text around itself and doesn't appear to resize well. Sure you can change the "size" of the frame but the content doesn't adjust with it. Pointless.
Thirdly, there is the mysterious login name issue. It seems that from time to time it "remembers" you using some other name to log onto the site? Isn't that lovely...come on folks. Even Microsoft can do security better than that. They say it's some kind of cookie issue but that's funny when the cookie should contain MY logon name not someone else's.
Now, even with the ugliness factor of the site, I went out there to participate. Well that would be nice if I could actually post something. However, when every time you click a topic to reply the connection fails and gives you an error it becomes a tad difficult to participate.
The thing is that there are so many good options out there to fix this that it's quite insane they haven't done something about it. Reading what I can of the forum I am not alone in my critique here. With things like vBulletin, phpBB, Joomla CMS, Drupal CMS all readily available and open source, there is just no excuse.
Heck go follow the lead of the PGA Tour and use Lotus Domino and other Lotus technologies. And while you're at it, ditch Microsoft ASP and Windows server. The moderator says he has "hackers" getting in the site and he has no idea where they're coming from. Hmm, competent IT? Hardly. Give me one IBM POWER system with the IBM i operating system and I'll run the whole thing (including PHP based apps) and be good to go.
Clearly GC isn't capable of handling this on their own. In fact there was a comment from a moderator indicating they were "looking at" outsourcing the web environment. Please do so...NOW! What's funnier still is that the moderator asked if anyone had input to send it along. Well the email forms don't seem to work (go figure), and when I try to add a comment I can't, so hey good stuff.
This is of course the Internet and there are other golf forums out there to participate in. Frankly I suggest everyone who's a golf fan go check them out, because Golf Channel's discussion boards aren't worth the effort.
Yes, but can he WIN?
One of the advantages of working from home is the ability to have things such as today's Masters coverage on Golf Channel in the background while I work. Sitting here this afternoon I see yet another commercial for the Medicus PowerMeter, which features touring pro Camilo Villegas.
Ok so Camilo can hit the ball a country mile. His swing speed is supposed to be 120 MPH. I believe this is still short of the competition long drivers who are somewhere around 150 MPH, but still, 120 is huge.
Now, last time I checked, my swing speed with driver was around 109-110. I've always been able to hit the ball a long ways, and today more distance off the tee is the thing that most amateurs seem to want more than anything. That's all fine & good, because I full well know how good it feels to stripe one off the tee to a long ways down the short grass.
Read more
Ok so Camilo can hit the ball a country mile. His swing speed is supposed to be 120 MPH. I believe this is still short of the competition long drivers who are somewhere around 150 MPH, but still, 120 is huge.
Now, last time I checked, my swing speed with driver was around 109-110. I've always been able to hit the ball a long ways, and today more distance off the tee is the thing that most amateurs seem to want more than anything. That's all fine & good, because I full well know how good it feels to stripe one off the tee to a long ways down the short grass.








